By Beauty Damned

Jason started getting a subscription to "Foreign Policy Magazine" and it's ummm..been an eye opener.

I didn't see Howard Stern in there, did I?

Weak.

Weak is citing anon sources from an Austin Production.

Weak is having no defense against the truth.

Aha! An anon souce from "some" Austin Production is the truth?

You truly are gullable. Keep lapping the kool-aid.

It's so entertaining to watch you squirm. You picked one article out of the MANY that I posted, all of which lend weight to the obvious fact that Bush doesn't like facts, and you try to tear down the OVERWHELMING truth, by picking apart one small piece of the evidentiary puzzle. The truth is that which is supported by all of the articles that I've posted here, what's been written in many books by those who have worked closely with or within the Bush administration and that which we have seen with our own eyes during speeches, debates and press conferences.

It's like watching a scientific experiment take place, you trying to fend off reality: *in a hushed discovery channel whisper*: "how long can this man maintain his denial while being confronted with overwhelming evidence of the opposing reality? Let's watch and see..."

Hahahahaaa! Your objections are futile Gordon, the world has already seen Bush for who he is. You can imagine him in your mind any way you wish, but the truth remains that he's a whacko fundamentalist rightwing christian with no patience for facts which contradict his stonecold convictions. All you can do is pray.

I struck a nerve again. You're volatile today, Maria. You're time of the moon?

I won't even begin to refute the rest of their editorials, let alone lend any credence to their credibility.

I'm just having a great time making you look like even more of a fool than you've already done yourself. (If that's even possible!)

Enjoying slapping you around like the crying little bitch that you are while you desperately grasp for something to say in return. You're the most wonderfully predictable person I've ever encountered. I always know you're getting desperate when you ask me if it's "my time of the moon." Once again, you betray your own condition.

Rightwing Christian..that second word is what is troubling me...I'm fearing so much that this man is "ruling" by faith and allowing his beliefs to convulute his way of thinking. Separation of Church and State..it's being muddled!

You can tell when Maria realizes she doesn't have a leg to stand on when instead of addressing your point, she starts talking about watching you squirm. Typical NeoCom tactic when they don't have the facts or are caught in a bullshit "belief".

Oh look! It's Geoffrey. *Hushed discovery channel whisper*: "look! Here comes a companion. He's sniffing. He's decided to join his lazy friend in the bog of eternal denial. Let's observe them both while they gnash their wild teeth at that which is indisputable...ssssshhhh."

And there's maria, doing exactly what I described in my prior post.

Predictable.

I've already proven my point. All I have to do now is sit here and observe while you guys thrash around like wounded animals.

And all I have to do is continually point out you are behaving exactly as I predicted.

Being predictable isn't nearly as worrisome as being in denial.

It is when your predictability contains zero substance.

Why don't you try debating on the substance then? Oh that's right, you can't dispute what has already proven to be true. Pobresito.

Hmmm.

Gordon calls into question one of your "sources".
You head off on a personal attack tangent, taking the debate off topic. Then you have the audacity to suggest I debate the topic, when you've already led it astray?

Heh. You lost before you began.

What substance? Howard Stern? Some anon souce from Austin?

I didn't even quote Howard Stern, which shows how happy you are to live in your little world of denial.

Now please, one of you, point me to a single source or a single article that disputes what I have stated in this entry. If you can't do that, why don't you go back to your little hole until you have something useful to add.

*Jeapordy Theme Song Commences*

oh gee, when one is gone, so is the other. how convienent. ya know, if they really are two seperate people, that makes it all the worse. they live in two different states yet they seems to gang up on others - you can almost hear the phone call

(gayffrey frantically dials gordork)

Gayf - "Hey ya Gord! Sigma Chi Kappa, woof woof woof!"

Gordork "Geoff, Wooof Wooof Wooof (does a double shot of yeiger miester and chases it with an icehouse ) whats up man? (turns head away from phone - "GET ME ANOTHER BEER, BITCH!)"

Gayf - "Thats right, keep that woman in line....hey man, get online, maria and nunya are ganging up on me, I need some help trying to bitchslap them back"

Gordork - "Cool man, let me call Mikey too, that way we can outnumb...wait (counts on fingers)...yeah, that way we can outnumber them 3-none...."

Gayf - "You mean 3 to 2"

Gordork - "Dude, thats what I just said"

Gayf - "Ok. let me know what you type"

Gordork - "BITCH, bring the beer into the shed! I am going on the INTERNETS....(typing - or pecks and finds - very slowly) Geoff, dude, where is the H key...oh, here it is"

Gayf - "Duh huh huhu huh, what are you typing dude!"

Gordork - "Dude, I am going to type as nunya saying "I like to touch my special place" then I am going to type to maria that she can fetch me some coffee!!! haw haw haw!!!"

Gayf - "DUDE! That is so funny man!!! I got one, type in how they both like to troll rest stops! haw haw haw!!!"

Gordork - "DUDE, that is funny! haw haw haw! There, its done! This is going to be awsome dude!!!"

10 mins later....

Gordork - "Wonder where geoff went....oh well, maria made me look like a tore up little bitch again...lemme go post on dogsnot as nunya.... (types in - I like to troll rest rooms) haw haw haw!!!!"

Ref: Posted by nunya at October 28, 2004 05:31 PM

NeoCUNT,
That narrative, hands down, is the funniest thing you've said in the last year and a half. Heck, it's the only funny thing you've ever said, but it was funny nonetheless.

It didn't take the felon long to disregard Maria's request.

"Bush's difficult relationship with reality."

A touching editorial piece, Maria. You are familiar with the difference between fact and opinion aren't you?

One source debunked and more to follow.

"George Won’t Be Reading This:The president prefers spin to news" by David Corn

Are you fucking kidding? I'm supposed to accept something with a title like this as fair and balanced? Thanks for another editorial and opinion piece. That's like citing my blog for fairness.

You are so out of touch from reality.

Consider one more "source" debunked.

It's just the truth about George Bush. Everyone seems to know it but you. It's called denial.

Oh yes, have you found a single contradicting article or source yet? Have you found one person who can say they have worked with George Bush and these things are untrue? That's what I thought. Burned again.

"It's just the truth about George Bush."

Opinion equates to truth?

An editorial is a fact?

Are you this fucking numb?

"Oh yes, have you found a single contradicting article or source yet?"

How can a person dispute an opinion? Moron.

Give me some FACTS to dispute, and I'll dispute.

What I find funny is NeoFelon spends so much time yapping about the election, and he isn't even allowed to vote.

THAT'S rich!

"George Bush Denies Global Warming Exists, Despite Scientific Evidence" by the Natural Resource Defense Council.

Are you kidding again? There as biased as they get. That's like me citing evidence from religous whackos at the 700 Club.

Get real.

"Bush Ignores the Facts With Good Reason"

I think the only one ignoring the facts - is YOU.

Another editorial, uh huh.

Where's the facts, maam?

I think that the opinions of those who have worked closely with Bush carry a lot of weight. Just as the opinions of those who any of us have worked with carry weight, providing they're not biased. Which in most of these cases, they're not. Contrary to what you want to tell yourself. These are people whose opinions about Bush shifted from the positive to the negative as they experienced his actions firsthand. That does not qualify as bias. It qualifies as firsthand experience.

If everyone who ever worked with me said I was a terrible secretary, I'd have a hard time getting a job in a reputable firm.

Opinions matter.

As for global warming. It's a scientific fact that it exists. That didn't stop Bush from denying that it was true.

You can deny it all you want, the man hates facts. Try finding a single person who can credibly dispute that "opinion." You can't. Because it's a fact that he hates facts.

No biggie. You're the ones voting for the idiot. Not me.

I'm not sying opinion doesn't matter. If it didn't, can you imagine an election?

All I'm disputing Maria, is that you're calling people's opinions - facts.

You're the ones voting for the idiot. Not me.

Really?

That's not what the data suggests