July 26, 2004

In The Spirit

Three words: Bring Back Bill!!!

That was beautiful. Absolutely beautiful. Now that's what you call a Uniter. NOT a Divider.

Bill Clinton.jpg

Text of Bill Clinton's speech

Posted July 27, 2004, 12:06 AM EDT

The following is a transcript of a speech by William J. Clinton at the Democratic National Convention:

Thank you. I am honored to share the podium with my Senator, though I think I should be introducing her. I'm proud of her and so grateful to the people of New York that the best public servant in our family is still on the job and grateful to all of you, especially my friends from Arkansas, for the chance you gave us to serve our country in the White House.

I am also honored to share this night with President Carter, who has inspired the world with his work for peace, democracy, and human rights. And with Al Gore, my friend and partner for eight years, who played such a large role in building the prosperity and progress that brought America into the 21st century, who showed incredible grace and patriotism under pressure, and who is the living embodiment that every vote counts -- and must be counted in every state in America.

Tonight I speak as a citizen, returning to the role I have played for most of my life as a foot soldier in the fight for our future, as we nominate a true New England patriot for president. The state that gave us John Adams and John Kennedy has now given us John Kerry, a good man, a great senator, a visionary leader. We are constantly told America is deeply divided. But all Americans value freedom, faith, and family. We all honor the service and sacrifice of our men and women in uniform in Iraq, Afghanistan and around the world.

We all want good jobs, good schools, health care, safe streets, a clean environment. We all want our children to grow up in a secure America leading the world toward a peaceful future. Our differences are in how we can best achieve these things, in a time of unprecedented change. Therefore, we Democrats will bring the American people a positive campaign, arguing not who's good and who's bad, but what is the best way to build the safe, prosperous world our children deserve.

The 21st century is marked by serious security threats, serious economic challenges, and serious problems like global warming and the AIDS epidemic. But it is also full of enormous opportunities-to create millions of high paying jobs in clean energy, and biotechnology; to restore the manufacturing base and reap the benefits of the global economy through our diversity and our commitment to decent labor and environmental standards everywhere; and to create a world where we can celebrate our religious and racial differences, because our common humanity matters more.

To build that kind of world we must make the right choices; and we must have a president who will lead the way. Democrats and Republicans have very different and honestly held ideas on that choices we should make, rooted in fundamentally different views of how we should meet our common challenges at home and how we should play our role in the world. Democrats want to build an America of shared responsibilities and shared opportunities and more global cooperation, acting alone only when we must.

We think the role of government is to give people the tools and conditions to make the most of their lives. Republicans believe in an America run by the right people, their people, in a world in which we act unilaterally when we can, and cooperate when we have to.

They think the role of government is to concentrate wealth and power in the hands of those who embrace their political, economic, and social views, leaving ordinary citizens to fend for themselves on matters like health care and retirement security. Since most Americans are not that far to the right, they have to portray us Democrats as unacceptable, lacking in strength and values. In other words, they need a divided America. But Americans long to be united. After 9/11, we all wanted to be one nation, strong in the fight against terror. The president had a great opportunity to bring us together under his slogan of compassionate conservatism and to unite the world in common cause against terror.

Instead, he and his congressional allies made a very different choice: to use the moment of unity to push America too far to the right and to walk away from our allies, not only in attacking Iraq before the weapons inspectors finished their jobs, but in withdrawing American support for the Climate Change Treaty, the International Court for war criminals, the ABM treaty, and even the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty.

Now they are working to develop two new nuclear weapons which they say we might use first. At home, the President and the Republican Congress have made equally fateful choices indeed. For the first time ever when America was on a war footing, there were two huge tax cuts, nearly half of which went to the top one percent. I'm in that group now for the first time in my life.

When I was in office, the Republicans were pretty mean to me. When I left and made money, I became part of the most important group in the world to them. At first I thought I should send them a thank you note -- until I realized they were sending you the bill.

They protected my tax cuts while:

-- Withholding promised funding for the Leave No Child Behind Act, leaving over 2 million children behind

-- Cutting 140,000 unemployed workers out of job training

-- 100,000 working families out of child care assistance

-- 300,000 poor children out of after school programs

-- Raising out of pocket healthcare costs to veterans

-- Weakening or reversing important environmental advances for clean air and the preservation of our forests.

Everyone had to sacrifice except the wealthiest Americans, who wanted to do their part but were asked only to expend the energy necessary to open the envelopes containing our tax cuts. If you agree with these choices, you should vote to return them to the White House and Congress. If not, take a look at John Kerry, John Edwards and the Democrats.

In this year's budget, the White House wants to cut off federal funding for 88,000 uniformed police, including more than 700 on the New York City police force who put their lives on the line on 9/11. As gang violence is rising and we look for terrorists in our midst, Congress and the President are also about to allow the ten-year-old ban on assault weapons to expire. Our crime policy was to put more police on the streets and take assault weapons off the streets. It brought eight years of declining crime and violence. Their policy is the reverse, they're taking police off the streets and putting assault weapons back on the streets. If you agree with their choices, vote to continue them. If not, join John Kerry, John Edwards and the Democrats in making America safer, smarter, and stronger.

On Homeland Security, Democrats tried to double the number of containers at ports and airports checked for Weapons of Mass Destruction. The one billion dollar cost would have been paid for by reducing the tax cut of 200,000 millionaires by five thousand dollars each. Almost all 200,000 of us would have been glad to pay 5,000 dollars to make the nearly 300 million Americans safer-but the measure failed because the White House and the Republican leadership in the House decided my tax cut was more important -- If you agree with that choice, re-elect them. If not, give John Kerry and John Edwards a chance.

These policies have turned the projected 5.8 trillion dollar surplus we left-enough to pay for the baby boomers retirement-into a projected debt of nearly 5 trillion dollars, with a 400 plus billion dollar deficit this year and for years to come. How do they pay for it? First by taking the monthly surplus in Social Security payments and endorsing the checks of working people over to me to cover my tax cut. But it's not enough. They are borrowing the rest from foreign governments, mostly Japan and China. Sure, they're competing with us for good jobs but how can we enforce our trade laws against our bankers? If you think it's good policy to pay for my tax cut with the Social Security checks of working men and women, and borrowed money from China, vote for them. If not, John Kerry's your man.

We Americans must choose for President one of two strong men who both love our country, but who have very different worldviews: Democrats favor shared responsibility, shared opportunity, and more global cooperation. Republicans favor concentrated wealth and power, leaving people to fend for themselves and more unilateral action. I think we're right for two reasons: First, America works better when all people have a chance to live their dreams. Second, we live in an interdependent world in which we can't kill, jail, or occupy all our potential adversaries, so we have to both fight terror and build a world with more partners and fewer terrorists. We tried it their way for twelve years, our way for eight, and then their way for four more.

By the only test that matters, whether people were better off when we finished than when we started, our way works better-it produced over 22 million good jobs, rising incomes, and 100 times as many people moving out of poverty into the middle class. It produced more health care, the largest increase in college aid in 50 years, record home ownership, a cleaner environment, three surpluses in a row, a modernized defense force, strong efforts against terror, and an America respected as a world leader for peace, security and prosperity.

More importantly, we have great new champions in John Kerry and John Edwards. Two good men with wonderful wives-Teresa a generous and wise woman who understands the world we are trying to shape. And Elizabeth, a lawyer and mother who understands the lives we are all trying to lift. Here is what I know about John Kerry. During the Vietnam War, many young men -- including the current president, the vice president and me-could have gone to Vietnam but didn't. John Kerry came from a privileged background and could have avoided it too. Instead he said, send me.

When they sent those swift-boats up the river in Vietnam, and told them their job was to draw hostile fire-to show the American flag and bait the enemy to come out and fight-John Kerry said, send me. When it was time to heal the wounds of war and normalize relations with Vietnam-and to demand an accounting of the POWs and MIAs we lost there-John Kerry said, send me.

When we needed someone to push the cause of inner-city kids struggling to avoid a life of crime, or to bring the benefits of high technology to ordinary Americans, or to clean the environment in a way that creates jobs, or to give small businesses a better chance to make it, John Kerry said send me.

Tonight my friends, I ask you to join me for the next 100 days in telling John Kerry's story and promoting his plans. Let every person in this hall and all across America say to him what he has always said to America: Send Me. The bravery that the men who fought by his side saw in battle I've seen in the political arena. When I was President, John Kerry showed courage and conviction on crime, on welfare reform, on balancing the budget at a time when those priorities were not exactly a way to win a popularity contest in our party.

He took tough positions on tough problems. John Kerry knows who he is and where he's going. He has the experience, the character, the ideas and the values to be a great President. In a time of change he has two other important qualities: his insatiable curiosity to understand the forces shaping our lives, and a willingness to hear the views even of those who disagree with him. Therefore his choices will be full of both conviction and common sense.

He proved that when he picked a tremendous partner in John Edwards. Everybody talks about John Edwards' energy, intellect, and charisma. The important thing is how he has used his talents to improve the lives of people who -- like John himself -- had to work hard for all they've got. He has always championed the cause of people too often left out or left behind. And that's what he'll do as our Vice President.

Their opponents will tell you to be afraid of John Kerry and John Edwards, because they won't stand up to the terrorists -- don't you believe it. Strength and wisdom are not conflicting values -- they go hand in hand. John Kerry has both. His first priority will be keeping America safe. Remember the scripture: Be Not Afraid.

John Kerry and John Edwards, have good ideas:

-- To make this economy work again for middle-class Americans

-- To restore fiscal responsibility

-- To save Social Security; to make healthcare more affordable and college more available

-- To free us from dependence on foreign oil and create new jobs in clean energy

-- To rally the world to win the war on terror and to make more friends and fewer terrorists.

At every turning point in our history we the people have chosen unity over division, heeding our founders' call to America's eternal mission: to form a more perfect union, to widen the circle of opportunity, deepen the reach of freedom, and strengthen the bonds of community.

It happened because we made the right choices. In the early days of the republic, America was at a crossroads much like it is today, deeply divided over whether or not to build a real nation with a national economy, and a national legal system. We chose a more perfect union.

In the Civil War, America was at a crossroads, divided over whether to save the union and end slavery -- we chose a more perfect union. In the 1960s, America was at a crossroads, divided again over civil rights and women's rights. Again, we chose a more perfect union. As I said in 1992, we're all in this together; we have an obligation both to work hard and to help our fellow citizens, both to fight terror and to build a world with more cooperation and less terror. Now again, it is time to choose.

Since we're all in the same boat, let us chose as the captain of our ship a brave good man who knows how to steer a vessel though troubled waters to the calm seas and clear skies of our more perfect union. We know our mission. Let us join as one and say in a loud, clear voice: Send John Kerry.

© Newsday

Posted by Maria at July 26, 2004 11:07 PM
Comments

I'm sure my mother sat there for those 25 minutes with an adoring, goofy grin on her face.

I think if they ever nixed the two-term thing, Bill would totally be re-elected.

Posted by: Daria at July 26, 2004 11:17 PM

Maria - do you think his speech was at all toned down (rhetoric against Bush)?

I'm curious as to your thoughts about the flap regarding the Clintons probably hoping for a loss for Kerry in order to put up Hillary in '08.

Posted by: Vickie at July 27, 2004 12:08 AM

Not at all. I think that "flap regarding the clintons probably hoping for a loss for Kerry" is total bull.

Posted by: Maria at July 27, 2004 12:27 AM

You know I refer to the flap in the media, right?

Posted by: Vickie at July 27, 2004 06:53 AM

Bring Back Bill!!!

Thank God for the 22nd Amendment....

Posted by: Mad Mikey at July 27, 2004 09:17 AM

"You know I refer to the flap in the media, right?"

Yes. And think it is a tactic meant to divide, as usual. The media for the most part is the equivelent to a giant shit stirrer.

Posted by: Maria at July 27, 2004 10:15 AM

Are we going to agree twice in one week Maria? Yes, the Fair and Balanced and liberal dominated media IS a giant shit.

but really folks...

Why doesn't Bush openly critisize Bush? Two reasons - the unwritten ethic of not interfering with a following President and empathy. If you read his book and listen to what he says, Clinton understands what Bush is up against and approves of how he's handled the situation.

Posted by: Gordon the Magnificent at July 27, 2004 10:49 AM

Maybe you weren't paying attention to the speech Gordon, Bill DID criticize Bush, he's just intelligent and articulate enough to do it in a subtle and effective manner, by criticizing his policies and the direction that things are heading rather than making personal attacks.

Posted by: Maria at July 27, 2004 10:54 AM

And I loved the comments made by the RNC chairman afterwards talking about how the dems are so full of hate and anger. The opening night of the DNC did not seem as anything such. It was more of hope and a promise for progress in the future. Not the campaign of fear the GOP wants to run.

Posted by: nunya at July 27, 2004 01:40 PM

You know what repugs like Vicki, "Gordon:, Mad Miket, etc. hate about Bill Clinton? That even after their party went against the Will of the people, even after their smear campaign and hatred for such a popular president, even after they speant million of dollars wasting precious tax dollars, even after they wated nearly 2 years on a blow job, and even after they pased an impeachment in the House - Americans still loved him. They hated that then and hate it to this day because they know if he were to run again, he would be elected by a very large margin over Bush.

It just kills you assholes to know that. And I love it.

Posted by: nunya at July 27, 2004 04:14 PM

But he'll never be able to practice law again.

Posted by: Geoffrey at July 27, 2004 04:22 PM

You think he really wants to? When he is commanding such a high price tag for being a speaker and being paid to do something that comes as naturally as breathing to him, why would he want to go back to practicing law? And at least he earned his degree and is a highly intelligent Rhodes Scholar. Waaaaayyyy out of Bush's 2.0 gpa in an ivy league school his Daddy got him into. And worst of all, is he is proud of being medicore (which I highly doubt he is even that - my fucking 9 year old nephew has more brains and common sense than Bush).

Posted by: nunya at July 27, 2004 06:15 PM

Great comeback. "Who cares if my license to practice was revoked, I didn't want it anyway".

Posted by: Geoffrey at July 27, 2004 06:21 PM

I find it humorous that a guy who lacks a GED mocks a man that graduated from an Ivy League School.

Posted by: Gordon the Magnificent at July 27, 2004 07:34 PM

"my fucking 9 year old nephew"

I always knew you liked to fuck kids NeoCUNT.

Posted by: Gordon the Magnificent at July 27, 2004 07:40 PM

Knock it off with the child molester comments Gordie. This isn't a trashcan. No lip.

Posted by: Maria at July 27, 2004 08:01 PM

Don't blame me for "Coach Nunya's" voracious appetite.

Posted by: Gordon the Magnificent at July 27, 2004 08:08 PM

Ha-Ha-Ha. Knee slapper.

Posted by: Maria at July 27, 2004 08:10 PM

Thank you. Thank you very much...

Posted by: Gordon the Magnificent at July 27, 2004 08:23 PM

Nunya you stupid fuck. With regard to your comment calling me a "repug" and "asshole": This is why nobody takes you seriously for once second. Idiots like you don't even read what I said that I LIKED Clinton's speech and that he was one of my favorite orators, which I mentioned in another thread of Maria's. You just keep fanning the flames with your idiotic, one-sided comments. You wouldn't know intelligent discourse if it slammed you upside your dumbass head.

Posted by: Vickie at July 27, 2004 08:28 PM

And I, for one, know for a fact that Clinton would beat Bush in a heartbeat. And it really wouldn't bother me as much as you would LOVE for it to bother me. You think you know so much about me but because of your inability to comprehend simple English, you lump all of us into the same dirty 'repug' pile without a clue in creation of what any of us really believes. About the only mystery regarding you is why the hell I keep wasting my time dealing with you.

Posted by: Vickie at July 27, 2004 08:33 PM

Because anyone who support this administartion and doesn't make 1 mil a year, in my eyes, have got some very out of whack priorities.

Posted by: nunya at July 27, 2004 08:38 PM

Yeah. National Defense is an out of whack priority.

Posted by: Geoffrey at July 27, 2004 08:45 PM

And how does Kerry not have a platform in defense?

Unilateral action is NOT defense. We use to live in a world where many nations were in unity. 9-11 DI NOT change that - Bush did. He deicded to act alone and not excercise wisdom. We held the trump card and had all the time in the word to use it when we needed it, instead, Bush used it for his own agenda.

And while we are on it - there have been many friends of Bush that have become or became more wealthy off of this "defense."
Until you can come up with proof stating Kerry has an anti-defense platform, you need to just shut up.

Posted by: nunya at July 27, 2004 08:53 PM

furthermore, like clinton said last night, Bush had a wonderful opportunity to unite the world after 9-11, instead he not only devided the world, but also devided our nation. You can say what you want about me, but when half of this nation wants this pig out of office, it should say something to the other side who thinks he is doing a good job.

Posted by: nunya at July 27, 2004 08:56 PM

We use to live in a world where many nations were in unity.

When the hell was that? You're in a dreamland.

And while we are on it - there have been many friends of Bush that have become or became more wealthy off of this "defense."

Who?

Until you can come up with proof stating Kerry has an anti-defense platform, you need to just shut up.

That's your modus operandi. Asking people to show proof of things that don't exist. It's an impossible, intellectually flawed argument. What you should do is post his national defense platform to prove me wrong.

You can say what you want about me, but when half of this nation wants this pig out of office, it should say something to the other side who thinks he is doing a good job.

Or, it says something about the side who wants to hand our national security over to the UN.

Posted by: Geoffrey at July 27, 2004 09:05 PM

1) Before bush took office, we had a very strong foreign policy - we were involved in treaties that were to contrl and reduce arms, we were in treaties to reduce pollution, we had very strong relationships with all of the EU and were inching along and chipping away at mideast peace. A lot of room for imporvement was needed of course, in the course of 1 year, Bush had destroyed all of the progress that not only clinton had helped create, but also Bush's father and Reagan helped create. See, it isn't a dem vs, gop thing it is a common sense vs. Bush thing.

Who? Haliburton for one. The entire royal family of saudi arabia not to mention allow our jobs bleed to India and Pakistan.

Proof of his plan - go here for that.

The UN was created to equalize the playing field for all nations to partake in issue affecting the world. In a Bush controlled government, he wants to isolate us. You support demphasizing the UN and making their role in world politics irrelevant. Of course, in our arrgance, the one time the UN goes against what our idiot pig president wants to do, we decide to turn our backs on an organization that WE spearheaded to create. We turned our back on probably what could have become the de facto in unifying a world. Instead now, because the administartion has another agenda, we have isolated ourselves. Creating a safe homeland cannot be a success if we cannot make nice with our neighbors.

Perhaps if we excersiced humility and had respect for the UN, we would not have to worry so much about security.

Posted by: Nunya at July 27, 2004 09:38 PM

this works

http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/national_security/

Posted by: nunya at July 27, 2004 09:52 PM

and where did I say the world hated us?

Posted by: nunya at July 27, 2004 09:53 PM

1) Before bush took office, we had a very strong foreign policy - we were involved in treaties that were to contrl and reduce arms, we were in treaties to reduce pollution, we had very strong relationships with all of the EU and were inching along and chipping away at mideast peace. A lot of room for imporvement was needed of course, in the course of 1 year, Bush had destroyed all of the progress that not only clinton had helped create, but also Bush's father and Reagan helped create.

Right there.

Great link. It isn't a platform OR a plan, though.

Posted by: Geoffrey at July 27, 2004 09:57 PM

so where did I say the world hated us? Hmm? I want to know where in my statement I said the word hated us. Sorry, you can't change posts here Geoff (like he is doing right now over his toilet bowl blog).

Posted by: nunya at July 27, 2004 10:00 PM

"Because anyone who support this administartion and doesn't make 1 mil a year, in my eyes, have got some very out of whack priorities."

Classic Nunya. The writing skills of an eight year old. Really Nunya, did you ever finish high school?

Posted by: Gorodn the Magnificent at July 27, 2004 10:01 PM

I just quoted it. I'm sorry I paraphrased it for you.

Who was it you spoke to that met me again?

Oh wait, you lied about that, too.

Posted by: Geoffrey at July 27, 2004 10:02 PM

I like to be touched by high school students.

Posted by: Gordon the Magnificent at July 27, 2004 10:02 PM

That is what I thought Geoff - you cannot prove that I said the world hated us, so you now revert back to your idiot comments.

Posted by: nunya at July 27, 2004 10:03 PM

Actually, I just did. I forgot that you can't read.

Who did you say you spoke to that has met me?

Oh yeah, you lied about that, too.

Posted by: Geoffrey at July 27, 2004 10:05 PM

This is what Geoffrey wrote that he claims I said the world hated us, my comments is the first paragraph - Now, I challenge ANYONE to show me where I said the world hated us:

"1) Before bush took office, we had a very strong foreign policy - we were involved in treaties that were to contrl and reduce arms, we were in treaties to reduce pollution, we had very strong relationships with all of the EU and were inching along and chipping away at mideast peace. A lot of room for imporvement was needed of course, in the course of 1 year, Bush had destroyed all of the progress that not only clinton had helped create, but also Bush's father and Reagan helped create.

Right there.

Great link. It isn't a platform OR a plan, though."

Posted by: at July 27, 2004 10:07 PM

Who was it you spoke to that met me?

Oh yeah, you lied about that, too.

Posted by: Geoffrey at July 27, 2004 10:08 PM

thats right geoff, change the subject - can anyone tell me where I said the world hated us in this comment that geoff claims I said those words?

"1) Before bush took office, we had a very strong foreign policy - we were involved in treaties that were to contrl and reduce arms, we were in treaties to reduce pollution, we had very strong relationships with all of the EU and were inching along and chipping away at mideast peace. A lot of room for imporvement was needed of course, in the course of 1 year, Bush had destroyed all of the progress that not only clinton had helped create, but also Bush's father and Reagan helped create."

Didn't think so.

Posted by: nunya at July 27, 2004 10:10 PM

That whole PARAGRAPH says it, moron.

Sorry to keep bringing up that you're a liar. It's easier to just remind people you don't tell the truth than discredit all the fine points.

Who was it you spoke to that met me again?

Oh yeah. No one.

Liar.

Posted by: Geoffrey at July 27, 2004 10:11 PM

That paragrpah merely points out that Bush has managed to destroy what three previous administrations before his helped to create. It says nothing that "the world hates us"

Posted by: Nunya at July 27, 2004 10:13 PM

If BEFORE Bush we had strong foreign policy, treaties, strong relationships, and were close to peace and Bush DESTROYED all that, then we now have no relationships, no treaties, and no peace. Sounds pretty hateful to me.

Who did you speak to that met me again? Oh yeah. No one. You lied.

Again.

Posted by: Geoffrey at July 27, 2004 10:16 PM

of course, the true neocon that you are, you would be able to massage and spin that out of that.

Are you claiming that bush did not pull out of the kyotot treaty, basically destroying our relationship with the most of the world in regards to global pollution? Did he not oull out of the nuclear arms treaty with Russia to reduce the nuclear arsenal by 2/3 instead is now trying to pass a bill to develope new weapons? Did he not go against the entire UN in deciding to go to war pre-emptively?

Does it sound hateful from me because I am so damn angry about it, it sure does. But I fail to see how I said the world hates us, as you claim. But, as you briught it up, I will address it - does the world "hate us?" I don;t know, I havent asked them, but based on what Bush has done, I am sure they are not very happy with us.

Posted by: nunya at July 27, 2004 10:21 PM

Who was it that you spoke to that has met me again?

Oh yeah.

No one.

You lied.

Again.

Posted by: Geoffrey at July 27, 2004 10:22 PM

and with that, moron, I am done with you. You want to debate issues like an adult, fine. You want to be a jackass, then I don;t want to waste any more time on you. I have a presdential campaign to help out with.

Posted by: nunya at July 27, 2004 10:29 PM

Ahhh, I see. You'll make up facts to support your arguments, then when you are proven wrong you run away crying.

Here's a tip: Don't lie, and you won't have everything you say automatically discredited.

Posted by: Geoffrey at July 27, 2004 10:34 PM

Having fun posting as me Nunya? I think Maria has always been pretty straight forward about her policy on forgeries here.

Not that you care. You always take giant shits on your friends?

Posted by: Gorodn the Magnificent at July 28, 2004 02:14 PM